The Evolutionary Roots of Deception

The Evolutionary Roots of Deception and the Subconscious Mind, David Livingstone Smith proposed that we can’t help but play with the truth because it’s part of our evolutionary history. He claimed that our ancestors developed the art of lying as a survival skill. In other words, if you don’t develop the skill of lying, you’ll soon be eliminated. The important thing to remember is that we are not born with the ability to lie. We developed this ability as we coped with this turbulent, uncertain, ever-changing, ambiguous world.

Kinsey cited additional research from a

Canadian study of 1,200 children aged 2-17 years old that demonstrated that lying gave susceptible children an advantage in cognitive development. They consistently demonstrated the skill of saying one thing and doing another while subconsciously retaining the truth of the matter. Analysis showed that the older these children got, the more hypocritical their lies became. Worse still, according to Kinsey, there is a diversity of individual differences that can affect truth-telling.

Extroverts lie more than introverts,

Educated people lie more than uneducated people. Colleagues who are overly concerned with their self-image lie more than those who are already overseas chinese in europe data accepting of themselves. The better you are at reading body language, the more likely you are to lie, because you can read people’s inner thoughts. If you have a good memory, you will be able to remember your lies better, making them more effective.

special data

Lying also exacerbates the “fear of what people will think

Robin Dunbar, an evolutionary psychologist at the what facebook has to offer for businesses University of Oxford, claims that prosocial lies, often called “white lies,” can help your career and improve interpersonal relationships in a workplace environment. Don’t worry about lying. As Hank Williams,Jr., said, “We’re just continuing an old family tradition.”98-featuredblog01 Every year the federal government conducts the Federal Employee Perspective Survey (FEVS) to measure employee engagement (E2). An engaged workforce is more productive and has lower turnover.

One component of E2 is investing in career development.

This is accomplished by supporting and maintaining rich data a learning environment that drives continuous improvement in supervisor and employee performance. In the 2017 FEVS survey, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) scored 72% for E2,[i] while the rest of the Department of Defense scored 68%. One reason for the USACE’s higher score is its emphasis on training and career development. In a fiscally constrained environment, one of the first things managers cut is the training budget.

Scroll to Top